Devan likes to go off tangent just as much as I do. Here’s a snippet of one that came in a work email sent to me not too long ago.
“These are visions of cities as machines for making money, if not for turning the poor into the not-so-poor, which is what attracts the ambitious and the desperate to them in the first place. There are other kinds of visions that start, as so many urban visions have done, with an attempt to deal with the pathology of the city. Modernism, after all, was probably as much about notions of hygiene as anything else.
But there are other, less-tangible visions that no city can do without for long. In some cases, they are a reflection of the ways in which societies organize themselves, most clearly as manifestations of a cultural identity. It is that uniquely Japanese ability to manage chaos into order, for example, that makes Tokyo so different from many poorer Asian cities with similar basic structures. Tokyo is a city without an obvious urban logic beyond the great green void of the emperor’s garden at its heart. It has no rational street address or numbering system, a hugely crowded underground rail system, absurd traffic jams-and yet it is one of the most intricately and carefully organized cities in the world. In any other culture such a chaotic structure would be reflected in external, literal chaos. In Japan, apparently genetically programmed levels of social cohesion turn the same raw material that you might find in a slum into something entirely different.”
-Devan Saddic
